How to Survive in the Project Economy Era

Look at your company’s strategic roadmap for the next three years. It’s should not be about producing the same component 1% faster or shaving a few cents off your supply chain costs. It should be about launching the next-generation electric vehicle, developing a more efficient jet engine, engineering a lighter aerospace composite, or releasing a new line of smart, connected electronics.

Your company's future is defined by a portfolio of new, complex, and exciting projects.

This isn't a temporary trend; it's a fundamental economic shift. The influential thinker Antonio Nieto-Rodriguez calls this the Project Economy, an era where work is organized around discrete projects, not just repetitive operational tasks.

While your corporate strategy has already embraced this project-driven world, your budgets - especially your technology budgets - remain stubbornly locked on the factory floor, optimizing the systems that build yesterday's products. To win the next decade, leaders must urgently rebalance their investments from running the factory to changing the product by embracing the tools that boost project productivity.

The Project Economy represents a move from a world of repetition to a world of creation.

• The Operations Economy (The Past): This is the familiar hum of the assembly line. It’s about Six Sigma quality control, optimizing supply chains, and managing inventory with just-in-time precision. The goal was to do the same things better.
• The Project Economy (The Future): This is the design sprint for a new automotive chassis, the R&D process for a novel medical device, or the complex certification journey for a new railway component. The goal is to do new things successfully.

As Nieto-Rodriguez argues, projects are no longer a side activity for the R&D department. For a modern manufacturer, they are the business.

This shift is being forced upon the manufacturing sector by several powerful trends:

• The Smart Factory & The Digital Twin: Every IoT sensor you embed in a product, every AI algorithm you deploy for predictive maintenance, and every digital twin you build for virtual testing is a project. According to IDC, investment in digital transformation (DX) is approaching $7.4 trillion, and every dollar is deployed through projects.
• ESG, Regulation, and the Circular Economy: The demand for sustainable products is non-negotiable. Designing for disassembly, incorporating recycled materials, and meeting stringent new emissions standards are massive engineering projects that define your brand and your license to operate. A recent PwC survey found that nearly 50% of CEOs are increasing investment in ESG — all of which is project-based work.
• The Speed of Business: Automotive model cycles have shrunk from 7 years to under 4. Consumer electronics are refreshed annually. If you can't manage the project of bringing a new product to market faster than your competition, you are already falling behind.
• The War for Engineering Talent: The best engineers and designers don't want to spend their careers maintaining an old product line. They want to build the future. A project-based culture, focused on innovation, is now a critical tool for attracting and retaining the talent you need to win.

Based on these drivers, the message from experts is clear: within the next decade, the majority of your organization's resources, talent, and leadership attention will be consumed by projects, not day-to-day operations. Your company’s value will be defined less by your operational efficiency and more by your project prowess.

The sobering implication is that companies optimized purely for operational excellence will become perfectly efficient at manufacturing an obsolete product. The winners will be those who master the art of the project.

The Great Rebalancing - Resource Allocation Shift
The projected shift in resource allocation from running the business (Operations) to 
changing the business (Projects) over the next decade.

For decades, the undisputed king of the manufacturing IT budget has been the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. Companies have spent fortunes implementing and customizing these platforms to manage inventory and production schedules, alongside Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) that control the factory floor. These systems are vital, but they serve one primary purpose: to Run The Business (RTB) as it exists today.

This intense focus on operational IT creates a massive and well-documented imbalance. The spending is formally categorized into two buckets: Run the Business (RTB) for daily operations and Change the Business (CTB) for projects that grow or transform the organization. 

The data shows the current reality is starkly lopsided. Across industries, large companies spend over 80% of their IT budget just keeping the lights on.

This heavy skew towards operational spending creates a barrier to innovation and begs a provocative question: If your future depends on launching better products faster, what percentage of your tech spend is dedicated to making the product development process more productive?

For most companies, the answer reveals a critical disconnect. Millions are poured into operational ERPs while brilliant engineering teams are left to manage complex project dependencies on spreadsheets, struggling to collaborate across mechanical, electrical, and software disciplines. 

This isn't just inefficient; it's incredibly expensive. According to the Project Management Institute (PMI), a staggering 11.4% of every dollar invested in projects is wasted due to poor performance—that’s your R&D and new product budget evaporating before it can create value.

To win the next decade, leaders must urgently rebalance their investments from running the business to changing the business by embracing the tools that boost project productivity.
​

The IT Budget - The Current Imbalance
A typical IT budget, heavily skewed towards operational systems over tools 
that drive project-based innovation.

This budget allocation imbalance is not a conservative strategy; it is a recipe for stagnation with compounding costs.

The Productivity Paradox

A landmark study by McKinsey uncovered a productivity paradox: higher IT spending does not correlate with higher productivity. The reason is that the increased investment wasn't funding innovation; it was being absorbed by the rising cost and complexity of maintaining bloated and outdated legacy systems — the quintessential RTB trap. When the majority of your tech budget is spent propping up an inefficient base, it yields diminishing returns.

The Anchor of Technical Debt

The single greatest driver of bloated RTB budgets is technical debt — the cost of rework from choosing easy short-term solutions over better long-term ones. This is a crippling issue, with analysis showing that up to 40% of an entire IT budget can be consumed by mitigating the fallout from past architectural shortcuts. This debt functions as a tax on all future innovation.

The Vicious Cycle

This creates a self-perpetuating cycle: the high cost of running legacy systems consumes the budget, so the organization feels it cannot afford the modernization projects that would lower those costs. This ensures the legacy systems become even more expensive and fragile over time.

Thriving in this new era demands a courageous shift in mindset and resource allocation.

Reframe the Conversation

Stop measuring IT as a cost center and start framing it as a value generator. Shift the key metric from reducing the cost of IT per dollar of revenue to increasing the revenue generated per dollar of IT investment. This elevates the discussion from line-item costs to strategic returns.

Fund Modernization to Lower RTB

The most effective way to free up cash for innovation is to make targeted CTB investments in modernization and automation that permanently lower the RTB cost base. Frame a cloud migration or application consolidation project not as a cost, but as an investment with a clear ROI: If we invest $5M in this program, we will permanently lower our annual operating costs by $3M starting in year three.

Champion Project Productivity

Your brilliant engineering teams cannot build the future while fighting disconnected systems and spreadsheets.  Investing in a modern project tech stack — like integrated Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) and Project Portfolio Management (PPM) tools — is not an operational cost. It's a strategic investment with a clear return: faster time-to-market and higher new product introduction (NPI) success rates.

Elevate Project Skills

Tools are only half the battle. As Gartner notes, project management work is increasingly done by everyone. You must champion a culture where project management is a core competency for your lead engineers and product managers, not just a task for a separate department.​

The Project Economy is not a distant theory. It’s the new reality of how value is created in the manufacturing world. The roar of the assembly line is the sound of your present; the collaborative hum of a project team designing your next breakthrough product is the sound of your future.

The impending wave of AI-driven technology will only accelerate this shift. Organizations that fail to rebalance their budgets now will find themselves unable to capitalize, cementing their status as laggards.  Stop polishing yesterday's operational machine. It's time to invest in the project engine that will build your tomorrow.